The AI summit in Paris has made an important decision: More than 60 countries have agreed on international rules for the use of artificial intelligence (AI). But there is a major contradiction - the USA, the country that leads the world in AI development, has opposed these rules. What is behind this and what does it mean for the global future of AI?
The USA: "We decide the rules!"
The USA is still the leading nation in the development of artificial intelligence. This was also stated by US Vice President J.D. Vance at the summit in Paris. He emphasized that innovation in the USA is promoted by an open, unregulated environment. According to Vance, the American AI industry is so successful because companies can work within a flexible regulatory framework. His message is clear: too much regulation could stifle the development of the technology. The USA does not want to accept international rules that could stand in the way of its innovative strength.
The international agreement: A step towards responsibility
While the USA is opposed to fixed rules, other nations are in favor of clear guidelines. More than 60 countries, including France, Germany and China, have spoken out in favor of the ethical and transparent use of AI. This declaration includes, among other things, that AI should be open, inclusive and safe, with a particular focus on the Global South. India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi emphasized that all countries, especially in developing countries, should have access to AI. The aim is to use the technology to promote prosperity and progress worldwide instead of deepening existing inequalities.
Europe's answer: money and infrastructure for AI innovation
The EU has recognized the urgency and massively increased its investment in AI. At the summit, Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced an investment of 200 billion euros to promote the development of trustworthy AI. Among other things, these funds are to flow into the creation of so-called "AI gigafactories" - huge facilities specially designed for the development and training of AI models. This initiative could make Europe a leading player in the field of trustworthy AI and set global standards.
The USA alone in a wide open space?
The US has made it clear that it does not want to give up its leading role in AI. But will its refusal to accept international rules lead to a global divide in AI development? The European and international community is focusing on responsibility, transparency and justice. The question remains: Will the American "Wild West approach" become a global competitive advantage or will it slow down global cooperation?
The USA going it alone: will the "Wild West approach" of AI divide the world?
The USA is blocking international AI rules - why? Because they see the status quo as an advantage. However, the world should not be driven by the USA, but should take the ethical and social dimensions of AI seriously. Without clear rules and equal participation by all countries, the gap between rich and poor could continue to grow - and that won't help anyone in the long term.
