AI helps, but not without control

In today's digital world, more and more lawyers are using artificial intelligence to make their work easier and save time. But what happens when this technology is overly trusted? A recent incident in Australia shows how dangerous it can be to use ChatGPT and similar tools without proper vetting. A lawyer had decided to use AI to save time and find case citations. But the consequences were serious: the citations ChatGPT provided him with simply did not exist.

AI as a research aid? - A double-edged sword

The lawyer stated that he had used ChatGPT to quickly gather information about Australian immigration cases. However, the AI could not provide him with real case citations, but simply made them up. A serious mistake that caused major problems for both him and the court. Judge Rania Skaros, who heard the case, made it clear that the documents the lawyer had submitted contained citations and alleged judgments that simply did not exist. It showed once again: AI may be fast, but without careful scrutiny it remains a double-edged weapon.

The price of a lack of time: how much trust can we place in AI?

The lawyer explained that he had resorted to ChatGPT due to a lack of time and health problems. But was that really an excuse? Even in stressful times, it is essential to work and check carefully. The incident clearly shows that a rash decision to blindly trust technology can have serious consequences - not only for the lawyer himself, but also for the entire legal system. The court had to invest valuable time to check the non-existent sources. A lot of unnecessary work that could have been avoided.

AI - curse or blessing?

The use of AI in legal advice holds immense potential if used correctly. But this case reminds us that technology cannot take over work that requires precision and human control. Lawyers need to take responsibility and ensure that their sources are reliable, rather than simply relying on automation.

AI in the legal sector: Quick success or costly mistake?

Perhaps it's time for lawyers to rethink their reliance on ChatGPT & Co. AI may offer a quick solution for research, but without control and verification, it is just as prone to error as humans themselves. And those who rely on the quick fix could end up achieving exactly the opposite: Disastrous mistakes that not only destroy their own reputation, but also jeopardize trust in the rule of law. Anyone relying on AI for legal advice should understand the technology better - and not simply give in to the temptation to rely on the machine's first best suggestion.